Difference between revisions of "Leather alternatives"
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
The result: None of the leather alternatives examined could keep up with the [[leather quality|universal properties]] of [[genuine leather]]. Some materials achieved respectable results in individual test areas, but overall, the performance of real leather was higher and is not matched by any alternative. In particular, the stability and durability of leather was unattainable for the alternative materials. So far, no alternative material has been able to match the extraordinary properties of the structure of animal skin. | The result: None of the leather alternatives examined could keep up with the [[leather quality|universal properties]] of [[genuine leather]]. Some materials achieved respectable results in individual test areas, but overall, the performance of real leather was higher and is not matched by any alternative. In particular, the stability and durability of leather was unattainable for the alternative materials. So far, no alternative material has been able to match the extraordinary properties of the structure of animal skin. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Investments in leather alternatives== | ||
| + | In 2022, $457 million was invested in alternative materials. In 2021 it was still 1.14 billion US dollars, which is due to the increase in interest rates in 2022. The environment for venture capital had deteriorated significantly in 2022 due to the rise in global interest rates and inflation. Out of a total of 102 alternative material developers funded, 64 companies were looking for alternatives to [[leather]] and the rest were looking for alternatives to silk, wool, or [[Fur - Fur skin|fur]] (also leather alternative) or down. Around 52% of material developers of all alternative material developers researched plant-based alternatives, near to 20% with microbes, almost 9% with fungi and the rest worked with recycling materials or animal cells. | ||
Revision as of 06:40, 22 February 2023
Research report from the research institute FILK on leather alternatives
In 2021, the research institute FILK published a research report in which leather with possible leather alternatives was examined for their technical properties. Title: „Comparison of the Technical Performance of Leather, Artificial Leather, and Trendy Alternatives”.
In this research work, a wide variety of leather alternatives were compared with the natural product leather. The product names or brands of the examined materials: Desserto®, Kombucha, Pinatex®, Noani® (= no animal), Appleskin®, Vegea®, SnapPap®, Teak Leaf®, und Muskin®. All materials of these brands are already available in free trade.
The materials examined consist of bio-substances and synthetic substances and aim to replace the tanned animal skin with a vegan alternative. A shoe upper leather competed against a synthetic leather and the leather alternatives listed above in this comparison of technical performance.
- Variant 1 of the leather alternatives: The attempt to produce leather alternatives from almost exclusively biological substances. For example, mushrooms are used for this. Brands like Muskin or Mylo are going this route.
- Variant 2 of the leather alternatives: Artificial leather manufacturers try to mix biomaterials into their plastic raw materials. Organic waste is used almost exclusively for this purpose. Leftovers from the wine press (wine leather), apple juice production (Vegea®, Appleskin®) or even cactus leaves (Desserto®) are milled and mixed in.
- Variant 3 of the leather alternatives: Natural fibers from plants (Piñatex) are processed into a kind of fleece material and are then coated.
The focus of the comparative study was on the tensile strength, tear resistance, flex resistance, water vapor permeability and the water vapor absorption
The result: None of the leather alternatives examined could keep up with the universal properties of genuine leather. Some materials achieved respectable results in individual test areas, but overall, the performance of real leather was higher and is not matched by any alternative. In particular, the stability and durability of leather was unattainable for the alternative materials. So far, no alternative material has been able to match the extraordinary properties of the structure of animal skin.
Investments in leather alternatives
In 2022, $457 million was invested in alternative materials. In 2021 it was still 1.14 billion US dollars, which is due to the increase in interest rates in 2022. The environment for venture capital had deteriorated significantly in 2022 due to the rise in global interest rates and inflation. Out of a total of 102 alternative material developers funded, 64 companies were looking for alternatives to leather and the rest were looking for alternatives to silk, wool, or fur (also leather alternative) or down. Around 52% of material developers of all alternative material developers researched plant-based alternatives, near to 20% with microbes, almost 9% with fungi and the rest worked with recycling materials or animal cells.
Additional information
- Muskin - MuSkin
- Vegan leather
- Bio leather
- Eco leather
- Wineleather - Wine Leather
- Piñatex - pineapple leather
- Nuvi Releaf
- Artificial leather - Imitation leather
- What materials can be called leather?
- PeTA - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
a kotori web solution